
Putting a flat into a private family trust is stamped as a conveyance in Maharashtra and Karnataka, at 5% of market value. Leaving the same flat by a registered will costs nothing at all, because neither state's schedule charges a will. A trust justifies that cost by doing something a will cannot do: it holds and manages the assets during your lifetime, and it carries on operating after your death rather than distributing once.
A private family trust is an arrangement in which you hand named assets to trustees, who hold them for people you name, under rules you write into a deed. For many families the will remains the right answer, and we will tell you where it is enough for your estate.
The trust earns its cost in a narrower set of situations: where a dependant cannot manage money on their own, where a business must not be split five ways among heirs, where somebody in the family is likely to challenge the estate, or where the assets need managing for years rather than distributing once.
This page covers the private family trust in India as a whole: what it is, the four types, who the parties are, how it is taxed under the Income-tax Act, 2025, what it costs you in stamp duty, when it is the wrong answer, and how to choose a trustee.
Two things live on their own pages because they need the detail: how a family trust is registered, which is the sub-registrar procedure state by state, and what creating one costs.
Related guides:
A will has no legal effect until you die, and its function is to distribute your assets to the people you named. For a great many estates that single distribution is all that is required.
A trust is a structure that keeps operating, which is why it costs more to set up and why it is worth more when the situation calls for it.
The Indian Trusts Act, 1882 itself names the will as a valid instrument for declaring a trust of immovable property. Section 5 provides that such a trust is valid where it is declared by a registered non-testamentary instrument or by the will of the author of the trust.
So the honest question is not which is better. It is which of these four things you actually need:
If none of those describes your situation, read the next section before you spend anything.
One conversation settles whether your estate needs a trust or whether a registered will does the same job without the stamp duty.
A WillJini lawyer calls you back within 24 hours.
A family trust has real disadvantages, and some of them are a reason to use a will instead.
Moving property into a trust is stamped as a sale. This is the largest cost and you pay it before the trust has done anything. Both the Maharashtra and Karnataka schedules split a trust deed in two: a declaration that disposes property, and a declaration that does not. Only the second one gets the flat fee. Under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, Schedule I Article 61, a trust declaration that disposes property is charged the same duty as a conveyance under Article 25, which is five per cent of market value in a Municipal Corporation area. The Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 does the same thing through Article 54, routing a funded trust to the Article 20(1) conveyance rate of five per cent.
On a flat worth Rs 2 crore in Mumbai that is Rs 10 lakh of stamp duty, paid at the moment of settlement.
A will is not a chargeable instrument for stamp duty. Neither the Maharashtra nor the Karnataka schedule contains an article for a will, so leaving the same flat by a registered will attracts no stamp duty at all. Against Rs 10 lakh on the trust route, that is the number to weigh before you decide.
In most cases you cannot change your mind afterwards. Section 78 of the Indian Trusts Act provides that a trust created by will may be revoked at the pleasure of the testator, but a trust created any other way can be revoked only where the deed expressly reserved that power, or with the consent of all beneficiaries who are competent to contract. If your deed is silent, it is irrevocable. Settlors discover this years later, when a family situation has changed and the document has not.
The wording of the beneficiary clause determines the tax rate. Where the deed does not state who benefits and in what shares, section 307(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 charges the entire income at the maximum marginal rate rather than at each beneficiary's own slab. A trust set up to help a family can end up taxed harder than the family would have been.
A trust is assessed as a separate taxpayer. It needs its own PAN under section 262, files its own return under section 263, and keeps its own books. You will be paying an accountant to handle that every year for as long as the trust exists.
The Income-tax Act and the Karnataka Stamp Act define a relative differently. The Income-tax Act, 2025 defines "relative" at section 92(5)(g) as spouse, brother or sister, brother or sister of the spouse, brother or sister of either parent, any lineal ascendant or descendant, any lineal ascendant or descendant of the spouse, and the spouses of any of those. The Karnataka Stamp Act's Article 48 uses a different list: father, mother, husband, wife, son, daughter, daughter-in-law, brothers, sisters and grandchildren. A daughter-in-law is in the Karnataka stamp list and not in the income-tax list. An uncle is in the income-tax list and not the stamp one. So a person who counts as your relative for one of these statutes may not count for the other, and the deed has to satisfy both.
When the estate goes to one or two obvious people who can manage it, when nobody needs looking after, when the assets are meant to be distributed rather than run, and when nothing about the family suggests a fight. In that situation a registered will does the same job, costs no stamp duty, and can be rewritten on an afternoon's notice.
WillJini writes both instruments, and where a will does the job we would rather write you the will.
Not in the way a company is. A trust is not a body corporate and it has no legal personality of its own. Title to the trust property vests in the trustees, and they hold and deal with it in that capacity, bound by the deed and by the Act.
For tax it is treated as a separate assessable unit, which is why it needs its own PAN and files its own return. That is a mechanism inside the tax statute rather than a form of incorporation.
Section 6 of the Indian Trusts Act requires four certainties before any of this exists at all: an intention to create a trust, the purpose, the beneficiary, and the trust-property. If any one of the four is missing, no trust is created.
Revocable. The settlor keeps the power to cancel it and take the property back.
Irrevocable. Once made, it cannot be undone except as section 78 allows. Most family trusts intended for protection are irrevocable, because a trust you can dissolve is a trust a court can look through.
Specific, which the Act calls determinate. The deed names the beneficiaries and states what share each one takes.
Discretionary. The deed names a class of beneficiaries and leaves the trustees to decide who gets what, and when. This is the flexible one, and it is also the expensive one for tax.
A trust can be revocable and discretionary, or irrevocable and specific, and every combination in between. The two axes are independent and they are taxed differently.
Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, which replaced the Income-tax Act, 1961. The rules that govern trust taxation are now in sections 303 to 308 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. Sections 160 to 166 of the 1961 Act are no longer in force.
The Act taxes trusts in four ways.
The income is treated as the settlor's own and clubbed back into their hands, under sections 96 to 98. A revocable trust therefore provides no income tax reduction at all.
The trustees are assessed as representative assessees under sections 303 and 304, and tax is charged at the rate applicable to each beneficiary's own share, as if that beneficiary had received the income directly. A beneficiary in a low slab is taxed in a low slab. The deed must state the shares exactly for the trust to be taxed this way.
Section 307(1) charges the entire income at the maximum marginal rate. Section 307(5) then explains what "not stated" means, and it is stricter than most people expect: a beneficiary is deemed unidentified unless that person is expressly stated in the instrument of trust and identifiable as such on the date of the instrument, and the shares are deemed indeterminate unless they too are expressly stated and ascertainable on that same date.
The test is applied to the deed, as at the day it was signed. Nothing you say afterwards, and no side letter, saves a clause that is vague inside the document.
A testamentary discretionary trust is treated more gently, provided it is the only trust declared by that will and it was made exclusively for the benefit of dependant relatives. If the trust does not meet both of those conditions exactly, the concession does not apply and section 307(1) charges the income at the maximum marginal rate.
The Indian Trusts Act requires the deed to identify the beneficiaries with reasonable certainty, and its own illustrations to section 6 show what falls short. A bequest to someone "hoping he will continue it in the family" creates no trust. Neither does a bequest asking the recipient to distribute property among "such members of C's family as B should think most deserving". A deed that describes the beneficiaries in language like that fails to create a trust at all.
The settlement into the trust carries the same risk. Section 92(2)(m) charges property received without consideration, and section 92(3)(h) lifts that charge only for a trust created solely for the benefit of relative of the settlor, with "relative" the closed list at section 92(5)(g). Name one person outside that list among your beneficiaries and the whole settlement can fall back into charge.
Section 307(5) tests the deed as it stood on the day it was signed. We draft it so the test is met.
A WillJini lawyer calls you back within 24 hours.
Choosing the trustee matters because the trust depends entirely on that person to manage the assets. The deed can be perfect and still fail if the wrong person is holding them.
How many trustees do you need? The Act fixes no minimum and no maximum. The only number anywhere in it is section 60 Explanation II, which says that where the administration of the trust involves the receipt and custody of money the number "should be two at least". That sits inside a beneficiary's right, it is phrased as "should", it is conditional on the trust holding money, and it is not a registration condition. Section 73 confirms there is no ceiling and expressly contemplates a sole trustee. Families commonly appoint two or three so that no one person acts alone and so the trust survives a death or a resignation, but that is judgement, not law.
Can the settlor be a trustee? Yes, and section 5 expressly contemplates it: the requirement to transfer the property is waived where the author of the trust is himself to be the trustee. But retaining too much control is how a trust ends up read as revocable, and a revocable trust is clubbed back to you under sections 96 to 98.
What the role actually demands of the person you appoint. A trustee is bound to deal with the trust property as carefully as a person of ordinary prudence would deal with their own, must not use it for their own profit, must keep clear accounts, and must act impartially between beneficiaries. Where there are several trustees they must act jointly under section 48 unless the deed says otherwise, and a trustee cannot delegate the office under section 47.
They are unpaid unless the deed says otherwise. Section 50 provides that a trustee has no right to remuneration in the absence of an express provision. If you want to appoint a professional trustee, or pay a family member for the work, the deed has to say so. This is the single clause that most often has to be added later, and later means a fresh instrument.
Provide for trustee succession inside the deed itself. Trustees die, move abroad, fall out with the family, or simply want out. Section 73 governs the appointment of new trustees and allows the number to be increased. A deed that names a mechanism for replacing a trustee saves the family a court application at the worst possible moment.
Immovable property, shares including shares in a family business, bank deposits, mutual fund units, jewellery, insurance proceeds and intellectual property. Section 5 draws one line that matters: a trust of immovable property is valid only if declared by a registered instrument or by will, while a trust of movable property is valid either on registration or on actual transfer of ownership to the trustee.
A deed covering both immovable and movable property is normally registered anyway, because the immovable assets require it.
Yes, to hold and manage Indian assets. FEMA and the RBI regulations govern the transfer of assets in and the distributions out, and immovable property carries its own restrictions. Residence of the settlor, of the trustees and of the beneficiaries can each change the answer, and it is worth settling all three before drafting rather than after.
You pay a government charge and a legal fee, and they are set in different ways.
The government charges are fixed by the state and published. Stamp duty on the deed, at the conveyance rate where property is being settled, and the sub-registrar's registration fee on top. We can tell you the figure for your state before you commit to anything, and the cost page sets out the mechanics.
Our own fee varies with the estate. We quote against the assets, the states they sit in, the beneficiaries, any family business, and whether anyone lives abroad. Tell us those five things and you get a figure on the call.
Tell us the assets, the states and the beneficiaries and you get a number on the call.
A WillJini lawyer calls you back within 24 hours.
A deed drafted from a template. A generic template cannot adapt the beneficiary and powers clauses to your own dependants, and those two clauses determine both the tax treatment and the validity of the trust.
Assets never actually transferred. Signing the deed is not the same as settling the property. Immovable property needs a registered conveyance into the trust, shares need a share transfer, and deposits need the account moved. If the assets are not legally transferred to the trustees, the trust does not hold them, whatever the deed lists.
A discretionary class of beneficiaries written loosely. Section 307(5) above sets out what that costs.
No provision for replacing a trustee. This is covered above and it is worth repeating, because it is the failure that surfaces ten years later when nobody is looking for it.
Believing a trust ends the tax question. A trust does not exempt the assets from income tax. It changes who is assessed and at what rate, which is a different thing.
The largest disadvantage is the stamp duty. In Maharashtra and Karnataka a trust deed that settles property is stamped as a conveyance at five per cent of value, and a will attracts none, because neither state's schedule contains a will article at all. There are three others. Unless the deed reserved the power, section 78 of the Indian Trusts Act means you cannot revoke it. Where the deed does not state the beneficiaries and their shares, section 307(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 taxes the whole income at the maximum marginal rate. And the trust is a separate taxpayer with its own PAN and its own annual return for as long as it exists.
Not in the way a company is. It has no corporate personality and title vests in the trustees, who hold it in that capacity. It is treated as a separate assessable unit for tax, which is why it has its own PAN under section 262 and files its own return under section 263.
It depends on the property, not on the trust. Section 5 of the Indian Trusts Act makes registration a condition of validity where the trust holds immovable property. For movable property the section gives an alternative: registration, or actual transfer of ownership to the trustee.
The Act sets no minimum and no maximum. The only number in it is section 60 Explanation II, which says the number "should be two at least" where the administration involves receiving and holding money, and that is a conditional recommendation inside a beneficiary's right rather than a registration requirement. Section 73 expressly contemplates a sole trustee.
Yes. Section 5 waives the transfer requirement where the author of the trust is himself to be the trustee. The caution is that keeping too much control can make the trust revocable in substance, and a revocable trust has its income clubbed back to the settlor under sections 96 to 98.
Four ways, under the Income-tax Act, 2025. A revocable trust is clubbed back to the settlor under sections 96 to 98. An irrevocable trust with stated shares is taxed at each beneficiary's own rate through the trustee as representative assessee, under sections 303 and 304. An irrevocable trust without stated shares is taxed entirely at the maximum marginal rate under section 307(1). A trust created by will is treated more gently in narrow circumstances.
A trustee is paid only where the deed provides for it. Section 50 of the Indian Trusts Act gives a trustee no right to remuneration in the absence of an express provision, so a deed that intends to appoint a professional trustee, or to pay a family member for the work, has to provide for it in the document.
Yes, and keeping a shareholding intact across a generation is one of the more common reasons to use one. Companies Act compliance applies to the holding in the usual way.
Yes, to hold and manage Indian assets. FEMA and the RBI regulations govern transfers into the trust and distributions out, and immovable property carries its own restrictions. The residence of the settlor, the trustees and the beneficiaries can each change the answer.
The income is charged at the maximum marginal rate under section 307(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025, because section 307(5) treats a beneficiary as unidentified and a share as indeterminate unless both are expressly stated in the instrument of trust and identifiable on the date it was made. The settlement into the trust can also lose the section 92(3)(h) exemption if anyone outside the closed list of relatives at section 92(5)(g) is among the beneficiaries.
It can be structured across generations, but Indian law's rule against perpetuity prevents a trust from running forever. The trust cannot run forever, so tell your lawyer how long you need it to last before they draft the deed.
Every figure, office and timeline on this page traces to a government publication. Where the state publishes nothing, this page says so.

Jatin founded WillJini to make succession paperwork survivable for ordinary families, in a country where the office that issues a document, the fee it carries and the time it takes all change at the state line. He has been a member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India since January 1995.
Every page in this guide series is reviewed against the issuing department’s own published material before it goes up. Where a state publishes nothing, the page says so.